Zürcher Nachrichten - US Supreme Court ruling curbs power of federal agencies

EUR -
AED 3.873085
AFN 71.98403
ALL 98.091865
AMD 410.865926
ANG 1.906142
AOA 961.670233
ARS 1051.538092
AUD 1.632295
AWG 1.89276
AZN 1.796773
BAM 1.955638
BBD 2.135523
BDT 126.389518
BGN 1.958718
BHD 0.396967
BIF 3123.440963
BMD 1.054463
BND 1.417882
BOB 7.308394
BRL 6.112667
BSD 1.057612
BTN 88.859931
BWP 14.458801
BYN 3.461213
BYR 20667.465977
BZD 2.131923
CAD 1.486845
CDF 3021.035587
CHF 0.936297
CLF 0.037463
CLP 1028.384713
CNY 7.626405
CNH 7.630566
COP 4744.106555
CRC 538.255361
CUC 1.054463
CUP 27.943258
CVE 110.255856
CZK 25.271148
DJF 188.334381
DKK 7.463529
DOP 63.724715
DZD 140.438353
EGP 51.981689
ERN 15.816938
ETB 128.080678
FJD 2.399904
FKP 0.832305
GBP 0.835681
GEL 2.883997
GGP 0.832305
GHS 16.895599
GIP 0.832305
GMD 74.867216
GNF 9114.244125
GTQ 8.168323
GYD 221.171657
HKD 8.209133
HNL 26.709785
HRK 7.521754
HTG 139.038469
HUF 408.314303
IDR 16764.161957
ILS 3.948029
IMP 0.832305
INR 89.078624
IQD 1385.485097
IRR 44384.968904
ISK 145.147177
JEP 0.832305
JMD 167.96607
JOD 0.747724
JPY 162.746281
KES 136.968641
KGS 91.215016
KHR 4272.645655
KMF 491.985906
KPW 949.015895
KRW 1471.950676
KWD 0.32429
KYD 0.881427
KZT 525.596411
LAK 23240.072622
LBP 94711.445261
LKR 308.984375
LRD 194.603861
LSL 19.241504
LTL 3.113554
LVL 0.637834
LYD 5.165572
MAD 10.544126
MDL 19.217406
MGA 4919.592002
MKD 61.604891
MMK 3424.85323
MNT 3583.063688
MOP 8.480797
MRU 42.220499
MUR 49.781576
MVR 16.291845
MWK 1833.947905
MXN 21.463322
MYR 4.713979
MZN 67.384089
NAD 19.241504
NGN 1756.545202
NIO 38.916773
NOK 11.69185
NPR 142.176209
NZD 1.797139
OMR 0.405466
PAB 1.057612
PEN 4.015067
PGK 4.252647
PHP 61.930171
PKR 293.652946
PLN 4.319842
PYG 8252.315608
QAR 3.85558
RON 4.982551
RSD 116.987298
RUB 105.311966
RWF 1452.579533
SAR 3.960703
SBD 8.847383
SCR 14.594154
SDG 634.2631
SEK 11.576538
SGD 1.416885
SHP 0.832305
SLE 23.83472
SLL 22111.557433
SOS 604.449871
SRD 37.238876
STD 21825.245831
SVC 9.254233
SYP 2649.368641
SZL 19.234405
THB 36.739624
TJS 11.274465
TMT 3.701164
TND 3.336823
TOP 2.469661
TRY 36.323111
TTD 7.181404
TWD 34.245573
TZS 2813.266686
UAH 43.686277
UGX 3881.678079
USD 1.054463
UYU 45.386236
UZS 13537.877258
VES 48.222799
VND 26772.804141
VUV 125.187913
WST 2.943628
XAF 655.902604
XAG 0.034867
XAU 0.000411
XCD 2.849738
XDR 0.796734
XOF 655.902604
XPF 119.331742
YER 263.483869
ZAR 19.17963
ZMK 9491.432086
ZMW 29.037592
ZWL 339.536511
  • RBGPF

    61.8400

    61.84

    +100%

  • BCC

    -0.2600

    140.09

    -0.19%

  • SCS

    -0.0400

    13.23

    -0.3%

  • CMSC

    0.0200

    24.57

    +0.08%

  • RELX

    -1.5000

    44.45

    -3.37%

  • CMSD

    0.0822

    24.44

    +0.34%

  • NGG

    0.3800

    62.75

    +0.61%

  • GSK

    -0.6509

    33.35

    -1.95%

  • RIO

    0.5500

    60.98

    +0.9%

  • BTI

    0.9000

    36.39

    +2.47%

  • BCE

    -0.0200

    26.82

    -0.07%

  • AZN

    -1.8100

    63.23

    -2.86%

  • JRI

    0.0235

    13.1

    +0.18%

  • RYCEF

    0.0400

    6.82

    +0.59%

  • VOD

    0.0900

    8.77

    +1.03%

  • BP

    -0.0700

    28.98

    -0.24%

US Supreme Court ruling curbs power of federal agencies
US Supreme Court ruling curbs power of federal agencies / Photo: Jim WATSON - AFP

US Supreme Court ruling curbs power of federal agencies

The conservative-majority US Supreme Court struck down 40 years of legal precedent Friday, curbing the power of federal agencies to regulate critical issues affecting Americans' daily lives, from air quality to drug safety and more.

Text size:

In a 6-3 vote, judges overruled the landmark 1984 ruling in Chevron v Natural Resources Defense Council, which said judges should defer to government experts in determining a "reasonable" interpretation of the law if the language is ambiguous.

But that had proved to be "fundamentally misguided," and defied the command of a statute asking courts to exercise their independent judgment on whether federal agencies have overreached, said the majority opinion written by Chief Justice John Roberts.

"Courts may not defer to an agency interpretation of the law simply because a statute is ambiguous," Roberts wrote.

The decision divided the court along its conservative-liberal fault line, with the three judges appointed by Democrats -- Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor, and Ketanji Brown Jackson -- voting against.

In a scathing dissent, Kagan criticized what she said was an unwarranted expansion of judicial power.

"In one fell swoop, the majority today gives itself exclusive power over every open issue -— no matter how expertise-driven or policy-laden -- involving the meaning of regulatory law," she said.

"As if it did not have enough on its plate, the majority turns itself into the country's administrative czar."

- Fisheries backed by Charles Koch -

When the Supreme Court issued its original Chevron decision, it was a win for the administration of Republican president Ronald Reagan, who accused the country's progressive federal judges of burying corporate America under masses of unnecessary and restrictive red tape.

But the political right has since decried the ruling, saying it unfairly empowers the central government over the judiciary and means agencies can alter the meaning of statutes, depending on who is in charge.

The case to the Supreme Court came by way of two challenges to a rule issued by the National Marine Fisheries Service.

Herring companies represented by conservative legal groups with ties to petrochemicals billionaire Charles Koch had complained they were being effectively forced to pay for the federal observers who are monitoring their operations to prevent overfishing.

"Congress expects courts to handle technical statutory questions, and courts did so without issue in agency cases before Chevron," wrote Roberts, though he said the ruling "does not call into question prior cases that relied on the Chevron framework."

But Kagan warned it was the latest in a string of recent decisions by the court that will "cause a massive shock to the legal system."

"It has become part of the warp and woof of modern government, supporting regulatory efforts of all kinds—to name a few, keeping air and water clean, food and drugs safe, and financial markets honest."

- 'War on administrative state' -

Backlash was swift among lawmakers and nonprofits.

Environmental group Earthjustice said the ruling "has granted their request carving out a path for multiple industries to take advantage of the changed landscape to challenge regulations they don't like before judges who will be empowered and emboldened to second-guess federal agencies."

"In overruling Chevron, the Trump MAGA Supreme Court has once again sided with powerful special interests and giant corporations against the middle class and American families," added Democratic Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer.

On the other side of the aisle, Republican Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, House Majority Leader Scalise and Whip Tom Emmer hailed the ruling as a "landmark decision" that marks "the beginning of the end of the administrative state."

The Supreme Court has been chipping away at the power of federal agencies in recent years, a trend viewed by observers as part of a wider conservative push, dubbed the "war on the administrative state."

On Thursday, the court ruled the tribunal system used by the Securities and Exchange Commission, Wall Street's government watchdog and rule enforcer, was unconstitutional -- in a major victory for pro-business conservatives.

F.Schneider--NZN