Zürcher Nachrichten - England footballers' wives libel spat ends with judgment reserved

EUR -
AED 3.898523
AFN 71.644005
ALL 97.648604
AMD 411.303772
ANG 1.914021
AOA 969.589347
ARS 1059.019177
AUD 1.626695
AWG 1.912116
AZN 1.80447
BAM 1.955933
BBD 2.144347
BDT 126.914629
BGN 1.954472
BHD 0.400029
BIF 3075.943987
BMD 1.061402
BND 1.421364
BOB 7.364849
BRL 6.103346
BSD 1.062022
BTN 89.684337
BWP 14.448665
BYN 3.475501
BYR 20803.485902
BZD 2.140647
CAD 1.480529
CDF 3045.163175
CHF 0.936725
CLF 0.037924
CLP 1046.446944
CNY 7.676591
COP 4708.91149
CRC 543.462642
CUC 1.061402
CUP 28.127162
CVE 110.75745
CZK 25.388317
DJF 188.63237
DKK 7.459344
DOP 63.949359
DZD 141.630617
EGP 52.228957
ETB 129.544535
FJD 2.403068
GBP 0.83336
GEL 2.907944
GHS 17.422944
GMD 75.88837
GNF 9160.963762
GTQ 8.206946
GYD 222.173049
HKD 8.255656
HNL 26.609498
HTG 139.686101
HUF 410.858482
IDR 16798.071884
ILS 3.986711
INR 89.576785
IQD 1389.00842
IRR 44690.345182
ISK 147.502873
JMD 168.751502
JOD 0.752638
JPY 164.256789
KES 137.455129
KGS 91.487137
KHR 4303.986593
KMF 488.643096
KRW 1496.142353
KWD 0.326385
KYD 0.885002
KZT 527.030748
LAK 23308.395923
LBP 95101.650121
LKR 310.555796
LRD 196.730493
LSL 19.220988
LTL 3.134045
LVL 0.642031
LYD 5.1637
MAD 10.530204
MDL 19.010191
MGA 4935.52124
MKD 61.5696
MMK 3447.393404
MOP 8.50898
MRU 42.348517
MUR 50.002527
MVR 16.409566
MWK 1841.533028
MXN 21.879534
MYR 4.710487
MZN 67.850153
NAD 19.221764
NGN 1775.386729
NIO 39.027305
NOK 11.770703
NPR 143.49454
NZD 1.792862
OMR 0.408655
PAB 1.062022
PEN 4.021622
PGK 4.261796
PHP 62.358462
PKR 295.01699
PLN 4.35371
PYG 8297.565537
QAR 3.864301
RON 4.975817
RSD 116.983541
RUB 104.280832
RWF 1449.875599
SAR 3.988118
SBD 8.864043
SCR 14.393167
SDG 638.433911
SEK 11.579719
SGD 1.421722
SLE 24.195333
SOS 606.572528
SRD 37.398523
STD 21968.885515
SVC 9.293071
SZL 19.221951
THB 37.033402
TJS 11.288563
TMT 3.714908
TND 3.340765
TOP 2.485908
TRY 36.491299
TTD 7.216832
TWD 34.42106
TZS 2825.309757
UAH 43.984498
UGX 3902.449814
USD 1.061402
UYU 44.775161
UZS 13601.870796
VES 47.628304
VND 26906.549368
XAF 656.032617
XCD 2.868493
XDR 0.800092
XOF 652.762858
XPF 119.331742
YER 265.111791
ZAR 19.232187
ZMK 9553.893659
ZMW 28.913333
ZWL 341.771121
  • CMSC

    -0.1800

    24.54

    -0.73%

  • SCS

    0.0200

    13.67

    +0.15%

  • NGG

    -1.2400

    62.9

    -1.97%

  • RIO

    -1.4000

    61.2

    -2.29%

  • CMSD

    -0.2100

    24.75

    -0.85%

  • BCC

    -2.0100

    141.13

    -1.42%

  • GSK

    -0.8300

    35.52

    -2.34%

  • AZN

    0.4000

    65.19

    +0.61%

  • RBGPF

    0.0300

    60.22

    +0.05%

  • JRI

    -0.3000

    13.22

    -2.27%

  • BTI

    0.0900

    35.24

    +0.26%

  • RYCEF

    -0.1700

    7.16

    -2.37%

  • BP

    -0.7600

    28.16

    -2.7%

  • RELX

    -1.2100

    46.59

    -2.6%

  • BCE

    -0.1600

    27.69

    -0.58%

  • VOD

    -0.8500

    8.47

    -10.04%

England footballers' wives libel spat ends with judgment reserved
England footballers' wives libel spat ends with judgment reserved / Photo: Daniel LEAL - AFP

England footballers' wives libel spat ends with judgment reserved

A headline-grabbing libel case over an online spat between two England footballers' wives wrapped up on Thursday, after lifting the lid on tabloid double-dealing and the lives of the rich and famous.

Text size:

Rebekah Vardy, whose husband Jamie plays for Leicester City, is suing Coleen Rooney, the wife of former Manchester United star Wayne, after she accused her of leaking stories to The Sun newspaper.

Coleen, the childhood sweetheart of England's leading goalscorer, was dubbed "Wagatha Christie" after she set up an elaborate sting to try to determine who was behind the leaks, then announced her findings publicly.

"It's... Rebekah Vardy's account," she said.

Fascination with the lives of the wives and girlfriends (WAGs) of top-flight footballers -- and their very public falling-out -- has produced wall-to-wall coverage since the case began last Tuesday.

Bystanders have even been waiting outside the hallowed Royal Courts of Justice in central London to snap the women as they attended proceedings.

Fevered online comment has divided support into two camps -- #TeamColeen and #TeamRebekah.

Articles have been written about the designer clothing worn to court and even Coleen's surgical boot that she wore for an unspecified injury has attracted column inches, and comparisons to Wayne's 2006 metatarsal injury before that year's World Cup.

Legal costs have reportedly run into millions of pounds (dollars, euros), and the women's lawyers have previously represented Hollywood actor Johnny Depp and Chelsea Football Club's former owner Roman Abramovich.

Vardy vehemently denies leaking details from Rooney's private Instagram account and is seeking "substantial libel damages", her lawyer, Hugh Tomlinson, said.

But she faced accusations from Rooney's lawyer David Sherborne of being "an entirely unreliable witness".

After a week of testimony from the women, the lawyers presented final arguments Wednesday and the judge Karen Steyn reserved judgment to a later date.

- Peter Andre -

For the final day of hearings, Vardy strode into court in a dark suit and green top. Rooney did not attend as the case overran and she had a previously booked holiday.

The MailOnline site pictured the pair at Manchester Airport, Wayne grappling with the family's suitcases before they jetted off to Dubai.

English libel law places the onus on Rooney to prove that her post alleging she had narrowed down the leaked stories to Vardy's account is "substantially true".

Vardy has nevertheless faced lengthy cross-examination and was even questioned on an interview where she derided the penis size of her previous boyfriend, the pop singer Peter Andre.

Her lawyer said his client was "entitled to an award of substantial libel damages" for serious harm to her reputation, to vindicate her and to compensate "distress caused by the publication".

Summing up, Rooney's lawyer alleged that Vardy "regularly and frequently leaked information to The Sun about a number of people... as opposed to simply Mrs Rooney".

He accused her of being "hand in glove" with her former agent, Caroline Watt, who did not testify and was unable to present a mobile phone she said she had dropped in the North Sea.

The lawyer alleged that Vardy is "not concerned about doing the dirty", accusing her of selectively deleting messages ahead of the trial and said that the "thrust of the reveal post (by Rooney) is substantially true".

Vardy's lawyer presented a very different picture, saying his client "made mistakes" by trusting Watts, who may have sought to leak stories.

But he said that their communications were "largely tittle-tattle, gossip" and there was no "contemporaneous evidence" of Vardy contacting the tabloid.

He said the case had been "serious and extremely upsetting" for his client.

Y.Keller--NZN