Zürcher Nachrichten - UN aims to set standards for scandal-hit carbon markets

EUR -
AED 3.946953
AFN 73.071916
ALL 97.907793
AMD 416.054408
ANG 1.937717
AOA 976.859734
ARS 1068.150307
AUD 1.625782
AWG 1.936954
AZN 1.828799
BAM 1.94998
BBD 2.170821
BDT 128.475368
BGN 1.951955
BHD 0.405083
BIF 3174.326182
BMD 1.074593
BND 1.421059
BOB 7.445709
BRL 6.19836
BSD 1.075191
BTN 90.708435
BWP 14.259443
BYN 3.518499
BYR 21062.020127
BZD 2.167092
CAD 1.49362
CDF 3078.708379
CHF 0.939151
CLF 0.037609
CLP 1037.658502
CNY 7.712364
CNH 7.650344
COP 4666.086387
CRC 549.958641
CUC 1.074593
CUP 28.476711
CVE 109.934852
CZK 25.21749
DJF 191.458589
DKK 7.456281
DOP 64.746762
DZD 143.676314
EGP 52.984973
ERN 16.118893
ETB 133.115177
FJD 2.431804
FKP 0.822245
GBP 0.830709
GEL 2.928304
GGP 0.822245
GHS 17.632376
GIP 0.822245
GMD 76.835539
GNF 9268.252531
GTQ 8.311195
GYD 224.938668
HKD 8.355072
HNL 27.127039
HRK 7.402903
HTG 141.477758
HUF 406.61627
IDR 16820.602094
ILS 4.030954
IMP 0.822245
INR 90.659908
IQD 1408.396622
IRR 45245.732582
ISK 148.519559
JEP 0.822245
JMD 170.577734
JOD 0.761997
JPY 163.980183
KES 138.687388
KGS 92.593915
KHR 4365.969707
KMF 489.96071
KPW 967.133335
KRW 1494.925262
KWD 0.329556
KYD 0.895926
KZT 529.265475
LAK 23596.356782
LBP 96278.459732
LKR 314.548299
LRD 203.740039
LSL 18.814772
LTL 3.172993
LVL 0.65001
LYD 5.217332
MAD 10.617413
MDL 19.282451
MGA 4974.062271
MKD 61.584503
MMK 3490.235704
MNT 3651.46658
MOP 8.608807
MRU 42.832766
MUR 49.864066
MVR 16.559353
MWK 1864.335865
MXN 21.547994
MYR 4.709401
MZN 68.671866
NAD 18.814947
NGN 1801.028266
NIO 39.56156
NOK 11.802936
NPR 145.134843
NZD 1.795285
OMR 0.413723
PAB 1.075181
PEN 4.032826
PGK 4.316078
PHP 62.679971
PKR 298.553585
PLN 4.327428
PYG 8406.909469
QAR 3.920426
RON 4.975799
RSD 117.022078
RUB 104.718543
RWF 1473.801421
SAR 4.036237
SBD 8.970515
SCR 14.573479
SDG 646.368366
SEK 11.607607
SGD 1.423567
SHP 0.822245
SLE 24.489844
SLL 22533.671617
SOS 614.466118
SRD 37.578865
STD 22241.902683
SVC 9.407835
SYP 2699.947096
SZL 18.809862
THB 36.700588
TJS 11.428791
TMT 3.761075
TND 3.338137
TOP 2.516802
TRY 36.937066
TTD 7.306195
TWD 34.554625
TZS 2869.162872
UAH 44.384807
UGX 3935.25518
USD 1.074593
UYU 44.915114
UZS 13747.713901
VEF 3892769.101624
VES 47.42333
VND 27160.334628
VUV 127.577856
WST 3.010132
XAF 654.005113
XAG 0.031857
XAU 0.000395
XCD 2.904141
XDR 0.806094
XOF 653.992978
XPF 119.331742
YER 268.487106
ZAR 18.835245
ZMK 9672.633524
ZMW 29.27037
ZWL 346.018464
  • RBGPF

    0.0100

    61.4

    +0.02%

  • RYCEF

    -0.0600

    7.15

    -0.84%

  • CMSC

    0.0000

    24.68

    0%

  • AZN

    -0.0250

    64.665

    -0.04%

  • RELX

    0.3300

    47.99

    +0.69%

  • RIO

    -3.3650

    64.105

    -5.25%

  • GSK

    -0.4700

    36.19

    -1.3%

  • BCC

    1.1980

    142.048

    +0.84%

  • JRI

    0.0820

    13.452

    +0.61%

  • NGG

    -0.5610

    63.739

    -0.88%

  • SCS

    0.1130

    13.193

    +0.86%

  • VOD

    -0.0250

    9.295

    -0.27%

  • BCE

    0.4100

    28.48

    +1.44%

  • CMSD

    0.0200

    24.91

    +0.08%

  • BTI

    0.0100

    35.41

    +0.03%

  • BP

    -0.8930

    28.917

    -3.09%

UN aims to set standards for scandal-hit carbon markets
UN aims to set standards for scandal-hit carbon markets / Photo: Juan Pablo Pino - AFP/File

UN aims to set standards for scandal-hit carbon markets

Governments could finally approve new UN standards for countries and companies wanting to trade carbon credits, a long-awaited decision some hope can bring credibility to a scandal-ridden sector.

Text size:

Carbon credits are generated by activities that reduce emissions, like tree planting or replacing polluting coal with renewable energy, but buyers have long relied on unregulated markets shaken by high-profile scandals.

At this month's COP29 climate summit in Azerbaijan, the UN hopes to approve rules and a verification system years in the making to provide some certainty for governments and businesses exchanging carbon credits.

In carbon markets, one credit equals a tonne of carbon dioxide prevented from entering, or removed from, the atmosphere.

The UN's proposed standards mostly relate to countries -- mainly wealthy polluters -- seeking to offset their emissions by purchasing credits from nations that have cut greenhouse gases above what they promised.

Climate negotiators have been mulling the idea since the 2015 Paris Agreement.

Observers say the November 11-22 UN talks could see a breakthrough, with a supervisory body expected to put fresh proposals for verifying carbon credits on the table.

"Most countries don't want it to be delayed any further," said Jonathan Crook, an expert with Carbon Market Watch, adding that there was "a lot of pressure" for the UN-backed carbon marketplace to get up and running.

Countries have already started to trade in carbon directly.

Earlier this year Switzerland bought credits from Thailand linked to emissions reduced by converting buses in Bangkok to electric power.

Observers say a regulated carbon market could provide much-needed additional revenue for developing countries to slash their own emissions without taking on more debt.

- Fraud claims -

An earlier UN foray into the regulation of carbon markets, known as Article Six, was rejected in Dubai in 2023 by the European Union and developing nations for being too lax.

This time around the supervisory body, which has spent months canvassing NGOs and specialists, say the rules are much more rigorous, and give local people the right to challenge credit-generating activities on their territory.

The new proposals include guidelines for future certification to ensure that a project either avoids the release of CO2 by human actions, or acts to remove the planet-heating gas from the atmosphere and store it over an extended period of time.

For example, owning an existing forest that naturally stores CO2 would not be credited, but efforts to protect it from a genuine threat of deforestation could be.

The plans set monitoring standards -- to check that trees are actually planted, or that the risks of a forest being ravaged by fire are properly taken into account.

The UN proposal includes plans for a fund, modelled on mutual insurance, which would see a percentage of each project's credits set aside in the event it fails to store carbon as promised.

The proposed rules still need to be approved at COP29.

This year, instead of giving negotiators the option of modifying the proposal texts, the specialist body has already adopted them for delegates to take or leave for another year.

Observers say it is possible that the text laying out standards for the voluntary system could pass more easily than decisions covering country-to-country carbon trading.

It follows collapsing confidence in the unregulated voluntary carbon market, where the credibility of many credits has come under scrutiny after allegations many did not deliver any benefit for the climate.

Some projects have been accused of fraud, while other forest-based initiatives have gone up in wildfire smoke, prompting an exodus of big corporate brands using these credits to claim carbon neutrality.

- 'New benchmark' -

The voluntary market, for its part, is eagerly awaiting a UN decision.

"We do expect that (it) will evolve to become a new benchmark for quality in the whole market," Karolien Casaer-Diez, an expert with South Pole, a consultancy that develops emission-reduction projects to sell credits.

That could boost standards across the board, she said, predicting "close and rapid alignment" with the new UN system from Verra and Gold Standard, the main private certifiers of carbon credits.

Crook said important provisions in the proposals include ensuring credits are not allocated to existing carbon stocks -- an unthreatened patch of forest, for example -- and that projects can show they do actually boost emission reductions.

But he said ambiguity remains in the wording that could leave texts open to interpretation, notably over tricky issues like estimating CO2 pollution over long periods of time.

"We know that the world is not perfect and that accurate risk assessments are complicated, if not impossible for many project types," he said.

The real test, he added, will come in putting the proposals into action.

X.Blaser--NZN