Zürcher Nachrichten - TikTok battles US ban threat in court

EUR -
AED 4.081513
AFN 77.230118
ALL 99.042862
AMD 430.140447
ANG 2.003297
AOA 1032.870816
ARS 1069.272543
AUD 1.642244
AWG 2.001578
AZN 1.891198
BAM 1.953279
BBD 2.244384
BDT 132.82382
BGN 1.955628
BHD 0.418727
BIF 3214.74806
BMD 1.111216
BND 1.437883
BOB 7.68095
BRL 6.070127
BSD 1.111556
BTN 93.071223
BWP 14.684447
BYN 3.637804
BYR 21779.834762
BZD 2.240568
CAD 1.512215
CDF 3189.190401
CHF 0.941761
CLF 0.037483
CLP 1034.264491
CNY 7.869634
CNH 7.889245
COP 4656.273092
CRC 575.347202
CUC 1.111216
CUP 29.447226
CVE 110.581035
CZK 25.072369
DJF 197.485658
DKK 7.459843
DOP 66.72826
DZD 146.835789
EGP 53.922652
ERN 16.668241
ETB 129.160898
FJD 2.451457
FKP 0.846257
GBP 0.841741
GEL 2.980835
GGP 0.846257
GHS 17.457112
GIP 0.846257
GMD 76.673956
GNF 9612.018347
GTQ 8.597828
GYD 232.625627
HKD 8.660018
HNL 27.735577
HRK 7.55517
HTG 146.669414
HUF 394.304073
IDR 17004.939355
ILS 4.199563
IMP 0.846257
INR 93.080735
IQD 1455.693038
IRR 46787.751798
ISK 152.292299
JEP 0.846257
JMD 174.634647
JOD 0.787521
JPY 158.672729
KES 143.346323
KGS 93.744637
KHR 4522.64896
KMF 491.711705
KPW 1000.093823
KRW 1476.253041
KWD 0.338843
KYD 0.92633
KZT 532.423365
LAK 24568.987385
LBP 99509.397658
LKR 337.191845
LRD 216.687298
LSL 19.545888
LTL 3.281132
LVL 0.672163
LYD 5.283827
MAD 10.841857
MDL 19.313599
MGA 5067.145444
MKD 61.530629
MMK 3609.186415
MNT 3775.91212
MOP 8.922126
MRU 44.114338
MUR 50.948991
MVR 17.057703
MWK 1928.515872
MXN 21.403543
MYR 4.724337
MZN 71.006746
NAD 19.546773
NGN 1821.761212
NIO 40.848097
NOK 11.769856
NPR 148.920849
NZD 1.788863
OMR 0.42778
PAB 1.111546
PEN 4.195007
PGK 4.36469
PHP 62.030859
PKR 309.085048
PLN 4.273859
PYG 8666.738233
QAR 4.04566
RON 4.975249
RSD 117.057684
RUB 104.038142
RWF 1489.029519
SAR 4.170346
SBD 9.246166
SCR 14.965422
SDG 668.391412
SEK 11.34546
SGD 1.440891
SHP 0.846257
SLE 25.38829
SLL 23301.639441
SOS 634.504739
SRD 33.417049
STD 22999.928891
SVC 9.726099
SYP 2791.963614
SZL 19.545971
THB 37.115306
TJS 11.838011
TMT 3.900368
TND 3.36811
TOP 2.611133
TRY 37.856354
TTD 7.550121
TWD 35.523332
TZS 3027.441423
UAH 46.079379
UGX 4134.627366
USD 1.111216
UYU 45.549582
UZS 14162.448707
VEF 4025438.551901
VES 40.818578
VND 27363.69546
VUV 131.925803
WST 3.108586
XAF 655.129292
XAG 0.036848
XAU 0.000435
XCD 3.003117
XDR 0.823859
XOF 655.049687
XPF 119.331742
YER 278.192985
ZAR 19.512729
ZMK 10002.272396
ZMW 29.428495
ZWL 357.811118
  • RBGPF

    3.5000

    60.5

    +5.79%

  • GSK

    -0.1300

    42.43

    -0.31%

  • RIO

    -0.0100

    62.91

    -0.02%

  • BTI

    -0.1300

    37.88

    -0.34%

  • RYCEF

    0.0900

    6.55

    +1.37%

  • NGG

    -0.3200

    70.05

    -0.46%

  • CMSC

    0.0050

    25.055

    +0.02%

  • SCS

    0.1000

    14.11

    +0.71%

  • BCC

    1.8200

    137.06

    +1.33%

  • CMSD

    -0.0300

    24.98

    -0.12%

  • AZN

    0.0500

    78.58

    +0.06%

  • RELX

    -0.3900

    47.37

    -0.82%

  • VOD

    0.0500

    10.23

    +0.49%

  • JRI

    0.0600

    13.44

    +0.45%

  • BP

    -0.1200

    32.43

    -0.37%

  • BCE

    1.1000

    35.61

    +3.09%

TikTok battles US ban threat in court
TikTok battles US ban threat in court / Photo: Antonin UTZ - AFP/File

TikTok battles US ban threat in court

TikTok faced pushback in a federal court on Monday in its efforts to stop a law that requires the app to divest from its Chinese ownership or face a ban in the United States.

Text size:

A three-judge panel of the US Court of Appeals in Washington heard arguments from TikTok, its owner ByteDance, and a group of users claiming that the ban violates free speech and is unconstitutional.

The US government alleges TikTok allows Beijing to collect data and spy on users. It also says TikTok is a conduit to spread propaganda. China and the company strongly deny these claims.

TikTok has until January to find a buyer or face the ban, which would likely provoke a strong response from the Chinese government and further strain US-China relations.

It would also upend the social media business and rile many of the app's 170 million US users.

ByteDance, TikTok's parent company, has stated it has no plans to sell TikTok, leaving the app's legal appeal -- focused on US guarantees for free speech -- as its only option for survival.

"The law before this court is unprecedented. Its effect would be staggering," said Andrew Pincus, the lawyer arguing on behalf of the wildly popular video-sharing app.

"For the first time in history, Congress has expressly targeted a specific US speaker (i.e., TikTok USA)," he added.

In their questions, the judges challenged this argument, comparing it to earlier cases in US jurisprudence.

This included a case from the 1980s where closing the Palestine Information Office in Washington DC was deemed legal because it was backed by the PLO, an organization officially designated as a terrorist group.

TikTok's lawyer countered: "Mere foreign ownership can't possibly be a justification, because it would turn the First Amendment (protecting free speech) on its head."

He added that seeing foreign ownership alone as criteria for forced divestiture "would be a pretty shocking change here," citing other foreign-owned media companies such as Politico, Al Jazeera, and the BBC.

The lawyer also questioned why the US law did not target e-commerce sites with similar Chinese ownership.

Pincus said that if you followed the US government's logic, which he disagreed with, "certainly those sites could well be susceptible to (China's) action, but they've been excluded by Congress (in the law)."

- 'Important questions' -

The judges grilled the US government on whether TikTok USA, a US-based company, should be denied its free speech rights.

The US government lawyer, Daniel Tenny, insisted that the content being targeted was a recommendations algorithm based at ByteDance in China, not anything created by US users, and that it was therefore out of reach of free speech considerations.

"There's really no dispute here that the recommendation engine is maintained, developed, and written by ByteDance, rather than TikTok US, and that is what's being targeted," Tenny argued.

The trio of judges will decide the case in the coming weeks or months, but regardless of their decision, the case is likely to reach the US Supreme Court, experts said.

"After listening to the oral arguments, I am more convinced that this case will end up in the Supreme Court," said Sarah Kreps, director of Cornell's Tech Policy Institute.

"Overall, the judges sounded more skeptical of the TikTok case but also raised important questions about the First Amendment, foreign influence and standards of scrutiny that I do not think were clearly resolved with today's exchanges,” she added.

The fate of Americans' access to TikTok has become a prominent issue in the country's political debates, with Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump opposing a ban.

Democratic President Joe Biden, whose vice president Kamala Harris is running against Trump, signed the law that gives TikTok until January to shed its Chinese ownership or be expelled from the US market.

L.Zimmermann--NZN