Zürcher Nachrichten - US pollsters underestimate Trump support -- again

EUR -
AED 3.943793
AFN 72.486161
ALL 98.111287
AMD 415.916499
ANG 1.935029
AOA 979.773665
ARS 1065.936617
AUD 1.633458
AWG 1.932698
AZN 1.828474
BAM 1.960861
BBD 2.167866
BDT 128.310105
BGN 1.957115
BHD 0.404606
BIF 3108.422473
BMD 1.073721
BND 1.434028
BOB 7.418734
BRL 6.098523
BSD 1.073656
BTN 90.846996
BWP 14.470491
BYN 3.5135
BYR 21044.932802
BZD 2.164216
CAD 1.496928
CDF 3079.431975
CHF 0.940301
CLF 0.03749
CLP 1034.465778
CNY 7.706957
CNH 7.644137
COP 4738.331044
CRC 550.464216
CUC 1.073721
CUP 28.453608
CVE 108.821827
CZK 25.340921
DJF 190.821961
DKK 7.458615
DOP 64.745446
DZD 143.390601
EGP 52.867555
ERN 16.105816
ETB 130.511109
FJD 2.422209
FKP 0.821578
GBP 0.83288
GEL 2.925928
GGP 0.821578
GHS 17.620042
GIP 0.821578
GMD 76.769264
GNF 9266.21306
GTQ 8.285963
GYD 224.625991
HKD 8.349083
HNL 26.943134
HRK 7.396897
HTG 141.265762
HUF 409.458118
IDR 16996.46754
ILS 4.013596
IMP 0.821578
INR 90.444411
IQD 1406.57459
IRR 45209.025195
ISK 148.302623
JEP 0.821578
JMD 170.068914
JOD 0.761482
JPY 165.622013
KES 138.510272
KGS 92.552172
KHR 4370.044454
KMF 492.435298
KPW 966.348713
KRW 1501.679389
KWD 0.329482
KYD 0.89478
KZT 529.302998
LAK 23546.70302
LBP 96688.789106
LKR 314.379166
LRD 204.141235
LSL 18.940487
LTL 3.17042
LVL 0.649483
LYD 5.202166
MAD 10.620168
MDL 19.20308
MGA 4960.591401
MKD 61.657555
MMK 3487.404124
MNT 3648.504196
MOP 8.597428
MRU 42.857543
MUR 49.94987
MVR 16.532146
MWK 1863.979996
MXN 21.652831
MYR 4.734049
MZN 68.616123
NAD 18.940565
NGN 1796.765245
NIO 39.486105
NOK 11.891665
NPR 145.364017
NZD 1.807175
OMR 0.41344
PAB 1.073636
PEN 4.06402
PGK 4.309111
PHP 63.209425
PKR 298.386938
PLN 4.35335
PYG 8346.540768
QAR 3.909257
RON 4.975839
RSD 117.008736
RUB 104.392606
RWF 1460.260643
SAR 4.033651
SBD 8.948297
SCR 14.587098
SDG 645.839949
SEK 11.652
SGD 1.431061
SHP 0.821578
SLE 24.372665
SLL 22515.390361
SOS 613.094967
SRD 37.401971
STD 22223.858135
SVC 9.39499
SYP 2697.756666
SZL 18.940511
THB 36.882311
TJS 11.434229
TMT 3.768761
TND 3.347843
TOP 2.514761
TRY 36.727594
TTD 7.280298
TWD 34.709053
TZS 2925.890001
UAH 44.514091
UGX 3951.197257
USD 1.073721
UYU 44.678844
UZS 13743.62919
VEF 3889610.952007
VES 46.951342
VND 27256.409142
VUV 127.474354
WST 3.00769
XAF 657.712619
XAG 0.031831
XAU 0.000395
XCD 2.901785
XDR 0.804447
XOF 655.506563
XPF 119.331742
YER 268.242403
ZAR 18.965567
ZMK 9664.758887
ZMW 29.097398
ZWL 345.737744
  • RBGPF

    3.1700

    64.17

    +4.94%

  • SCS

    0.7400

    13.06

    +5.67%

  • CMSC

    -0.1700

    24.51

    -0.69%

  • VOD

    -0.1000

    9.31

    -1.07%

  • RYCEF

    0.0800

    7.38

    +1.08%

  • CMSD

    -0.1900

    24.85

    -0.76%

  • RELX

    -0.2000

    47.71

    -0.42%

  • NGG

    -1.3500

    64.12

    -2.11%

  • RIO

    -0.1700

    65.33

    -0.26%

  • GSK

    -1.1200

    35.9

    -3.12%

  • BTI

    0.1800

    35.64

    +0.51%

  • BCC

    3.2700

    141.76

    +2.31%

  • BCE

    -0.1000

    28.74

    -0.35%

  • JRI

    -0.0200

    13.25

    -0.15%

  • AZN

    -2.4200

    63.85

    -3.79%

  • BP

    0.2000

    30.16

    +0.66%

US pollsters underestimate Trump support -- again
US pollsters underestimate Trump support -- again / Photo: Olivia BUGAULT, Samuel BARBOSA - AFP

US pollsters underestimate Trump support -- again

Opinion polls underestimated the level of Donald Trump's support for the third US presidential election in a row, predicting a neck-and-neck race with Kamala Harris when in the end the Republican edged the vice president across battleground states.

Text size:

Trump's win involved surging support in a number of demographics and regions, but experts said pollsters failed to accurately predict races in states where the results differed significantly from the last election in 2020.

"They did fine in battlegrounds, but... they failed to provide the essential information that Trump was surging across the board," said Michael Bailey, a professor of political science at Georgetown University.

More than 90 percent of US counties voted in higher numbers for the Republican billionaire than they did in 2020, according to The New York Times.

Overall, the polls had predicted razor thin margins in races in the seven battleground states that decide close US elections. As of Wednesday, Trump was projected to win five of those states by between one and three percentage points.

The former president was well on his way to sweeping all seven states, according to those projections.

"Trump may have been mildly underestimated but I think the polls ended up doing pretty well, collectively -- this was not a huge miss," said Kyle Kondik, a political analyst at the University of Virginia.

"The polls suggested Trump had a decent chance to win, and he won."

- Small margins -

The pollsters' performance was under the microscope this year, after two big misses in succession: they had failed to anticipate Trump's victory in 2016, and had overestimated the margin by which President Joe Biden won against him in 2020.

"Trump was underestimated by about two points this time around" in key states, said Pedro Azevedo, Head of US polling at AtlasIntel.

In Pennsylvania, the latest polling average from RealClearPolitics put the Republican in the lead by 0.4 percentage points. As of Wednesday, he was ahead by two points.

In North Carolina, polls predicted a 1.2-point margin for Trump, and he won by three points over Harris.

In Wisconsin, the vice president was given a 0.4-point lead, but the projected results showed Trump leading the count by 0.9 points.

- Unable to adjust -

The main problem has not changed since Trump's arrival on the US political scene about a decade ago: a fringe of his electorate refuses to take part in opinion polls, and firms have failed to be able to accurately gauge their impact.

In the most recent polls conducted by The New York Times with Siena College, "white Democrats were 16 percent likelier to respond than white Republicans," NYT data analyst and polling guru Nate Cohn wrote two days before the election.

That disparity had grown over the course of the 2024 campaign, he added.

Although pollsters like The New York Times/Siena tried to compensate for these flaws with statistical adjustments, it was clearly not enough.

"It is apparent that polls significantly underestimated Trump's growth among Hispanic voters," said Azevedo, pointing to Trump's larger-than-expected victories in Nevada and Florida.

"This is also the case among white voters," he said, adding that while most polls expected Harris to "improve her margins" in this demographic, Trump outperformed the polling and ran up his numbers in rural areas.

Iowa was a prime example of this, with a poll three days before Election Day giving Harris a three-point victory in the solidly Republican state. In the end, Trump won it comfortably by 13 points, Azevedo said.

J. Ann Selzer, the author of that inaccurate Iowa poll, said the difference could have been made by late-deciding voters.

"The late deciders could have opted for Trump in the final days of the campaign after interviewing was complete," she told the Des Moines Register newspaper.

"The people who had already voted but opted not to tell our interviewers for whom they voted could have given Trump an edge."

N.Zaugg--NZN