Zürcher Nachrichten - Carbon credits: a contested tool to fight deforestation

EUR -
AED 3.82149
AFN 73.041433
ALL 98.55892
AMD 415.721985
ANG 1.87395
AOA 948.863211
ARS 1066.595859
AUD 1.667379
AWG 1.872757
AZN 1.76665
BAM 1.956393
BBD 2.099416
BDT 124.252877
BGN 1.957548
BHD 0.392547
BIF 3074.702209
BMD 1.04042
BND 1.412915
BOB 7.185177
BRL 6.426779
BSD 1.039805
BTN 88.508971
BWP 14.441237
BYN 3.402798
BYR 20392.23769
BZD 2.092314
CAD 1.494665
CDF 2986.006583
CHF 0.936999
CLF 0.037354
CLP 1030.723435
CNY 7.590496
CNH 7.601534
COP 4550.704712
CRC 527.954918
CUC 1.04042
CUP 27.571138
CVE 110.294183
CZK 25.112052
DJF 184.903571
DKK 7.464496
DOP 63.339194
DZD 140.460985
EGP 52.914317
ERN 15.606304
ETB 132.393121
FJD 2.412371
FKP 0.823994
GBP 0.829996
GEL 2.923886
GGP 0.823994
GHS 15.284632
GIP 0.823994
GMD 74.909813
GNF 8986.377753
GTQ 8.00935
GYD 217.545925
HKD 8.081667
HNL 26.419006
HRK 7.462837
HTG 135.959895
HUF 411.759841
IDR 16830.931058
ILS 3.797779
IMP 0.823994
INR 88.624821
IQD 1362.112776
IRR 43788.690905
ISK 145.190824
JEP 0.823994
JMD 162.002865
JOD 0.737968
JPY 163.685187
KES 134.38118
KGS 90.51648
KHR 4179.22631
KMF 484.965928
KPW 936.37768
KRW 1517.400665
KWD 0.320637
KYD 0.866554
KZT 538.668061
LAK 22739.672498
LBP 93114.317485
LKR 306.441083
LRD 189.24553
LSL 19.334273
LTL 3.07209
LVL 0.62934
LYD 5.104351
MAD 10.485474
MDL 19.184629
MGA 4904.439109
MKD 61.579469
MMK 3379.244519
MNT 3535.348011
MOP 8.318241
MRU 41.506983
MUR 48.972477
MVR 16.024479
MWK 1803.046398
MXN 21.002705
MYR 4.668339
MZN 66.486737
NAD 19.334459
NGN 1604.255567
NIO 38.261595
NOK 11.813837
NPR 141.614554
NZD 1.843034
OMR 0.399934
PAB 1.039815
PEN 3.871824
PGK 4.220117
PHP 61.176038
PKR 289.469892
PLN 4.26282
PYG 8109.457501
QAR 3.781746
RON 4.977686
RSD 116.881322
RUB 103.94356
RWF 1450.525627
SAR 3.905049
SBD 8.722421
SCR 14.50686
SDG 625.81609
SEK 11.528252
SGD 1.415175
SHP 0.823994
SLE 23.718639
SLL 21817.096429
SOS 594.274378
SRD 36.475085
STD 21534.59941
SVC 9.098407
SYP 2614.087445
SZL 19.342676
THB 35.556355
TJS 11.375447
TMT 3.651875
TND 3.315505
TOP 2.436769
TRY 36.611485
TTD 7.066073
TWD 33.958811
TZS 2517.817245
UAH 43.597336
UGX 3806.116828
USD 1.04042
UYU 46.282246
UZS 13423.551809
VES 53.660282
VND 26468.292186
VUV 123.520781
WST 2.87446
XAF 656.149534
XAG 0.035161
XAU 0.000398
XCD 2.811788
XDR 0.797234
XOF 656.130609
XPF 119.331742
YER 260.495182
ZAR 19.412609
ZMK 9365.027402
ZMW 28.776721
ZWL 335.014909
  • RBGPF

    -0.7000

    59.8

    -1.17%

  • NGG

    -0.1600

    58.86

    -0.27%

  • RELX

    0.3000

    45.89

    +0.65%

  • GSK

    -0.0300

    34.03

    -0.09%

  • AZN

    -0.3300

    66.3

    -0.5%

  • RIO

    -0.0300

    59.2

    -0.05%

  • SCS

    0.0800

    11.73

    +0.68%

  • BCC

    0.9500

    123.19

    +0.77%

  • RYCEF

    0.0000

    7.25

    0%

  • BTI

    0.0400

    36.26

    +0.11%

  • CMSC

    -0.1321

    23.77

    -0.56%

  • VOD

    0.0600

    8.43

    +0.71%

  • BP

    0.0400

    28.79

    +0.14%

  • BCE

    0.0600

    22.9

    +0.26%

  • CMSD

    0.1000

    23.65

    +0.42%

  • JRI

    0.0500

    12.15

    +0.41%

Carbon credits: a contested tool to fight deforestation
Carbon credits: a contested tool to fight deforestation / Photo: Jack TAYLOR - AFP/File

Carbon credits: a contested tool to fight deforestation

Planting trees or safeguarding tropical rainforests have become popular tools for companies seeking to offset their carbon emissions and proclaim their commitment to the environment.

Text size:

However, recent scandals have cast a shadow over the carbon credit industry, revealing a landscape rife with opportunities for greenwashing.

Walt Disney, JP Morgan Bank and other major corporations have been accused of purchasing carbon credits from forest protection projects in areas that were not actually at risk of deforestation.

Separately, a company responsible for managing 600,000 hectares of land in the United States has reportedly earned $53 million over the past two years from carbon credits that did not significantly alter its forest management practices.

None of these projects sequestered carbon beyond that which would have been absorbed by trees through photosynthesis in a business-as-usual scenario.

Still, companies counted the resulting carbon credits towards their own reduction targets, allowing them to offset emissions in the carbon accounting of their operations.

Leaders and experts from around the world will gather in the Gabonese capital Libreville on March 1 and 2 for the One Forest Summit.

Co-presided by France and Gabon, the meeting will focus on improving financial instruments aimed at protecting the world's forests.

Carbon credits are already widely used. According to various estimates, the number of tons of CO2 they represent (with one credit equivalent to one ton) could increase tenfold by 2030, to around two billion tons.

"The risky aspect of the carbon credit market is that it is not self-regulating," said Cesar Dugast from French environmental consultancy Carbone 4, in an interview with AFP.

"Everyone has an interest in maximising the quantity of carbon credits. It enables the project developers to spread the total cost over a maximum number of credits, offering a lower cost to buyers.

"Even the certifiers have an interest in the proliferation of projects," he added.

In mid-January, The Guardian, Die Zeit and an NGO revealed that more than 90 percent of projects certified by leading verifier Verra for forest conservation under the UN programme to reduce deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+) were likely "ghost credits" that did not represent "real emissions reductions".

Verra's CEO, David Antonioli, rejected these findings, arguing that "REDD projects are not some abstract concept on a piece of paper; they represent real projects on the ground that deliver life-affirming benefits."

- Carbon credits under debate -

After the story came out, the price of nature-related carbon credits has dropped, according to Paula VanLaningham, global head of carbon at S&P Global.

The revelations about REDD+ projects have sparked a wider debate about the entire carbon credit system.

"Are the projects themselves a good vehicle for carbon finance in a way that actually leads to a just transition? Probably both yes and no," she told AFP.

Several independent rating agencies have since defended their methodologies, stressing the crucial need for financing projects protecting nature.

"The first issue we look at is additionality: would the project have happened in absence of the carbon markets?" Donna Lee, co-founder of Calyx Global, an independent rating agency for carbon projects, told AFP.

"We then look at how the baseline was set and what would have happened in the absence of the project."

The core issue with initiatives aimed at halting deforestation is the challenge of proving that deforestation would have occurred without the funding.

"We look at patterns of deforestation in the region... a lot of scientific studies show that there are certain things like roads, population, distance to the forest edge, that are often associated with deforestation," Lee said.

Above all, the companies that buy these credits should be "more transparent" by clearly indicating where credits are sourced and how they reduce their own emissions, she said.

"We need to move from a mentality of compensating to a mindset of contributing," said Dugast from Carbone 4.

In other words, companies financing forests to offset carbon emissions is acceptable, but not as a loophole to avoid reducing their own emissions.

W.O.Ludwig--NZN